Operators regularly ask what the arrival of Chinese charger manufacturers means for their networks. The honest answer starts with what is not known, then moves to what is: the rules that apply to a charge point sold in Europe do not depend on where it was built. This article sets out those rules as a procurement checklist, so that the question becomes one about conformity and not about origin.
What the sources support, and what they do not
For electric cars, the data is clear. The IEA reports that EU imports of electric cars rose by 35% to more than 900,000 in 2025, with China accounting for almost 60% of them (IEA, Global EV Outlook 2026). That concerns vehicles, not chargers.
For charge point manufacturers, we found no sourced figure on market share by country of origin in Europe. So we give none, and we make no generalisation about the quality, security or protocol behaviour of any group of manufacturers. Such claims have to be tested model by model, with evidence from the supplier and from your own pilot.
The requirements that apply to every charger
Whatever its origin, a public charge point in the EU falls under the AFIR, a regulation that is directly applicable in all Member States and has applied since 13 April 2024. Check each model against the following.
None of these requirements names OCPP. The regulation does not oblige a given protocol, so a supplier who writes "AFIR compliant" in a brochure has not told you which protocol version or which functions the model actually supports.
Data your backend must be able to feed
Since 14 April 2025, operators must make static and dynamic data available free of charge. The dynamic data includes the operational status, the availability, the ad hoc price, and whether the electricity is entirely renewable. The implementing regulation 2025/655 requires the DATEX II format, at least CEN/TS 16157-10:2022, from 14 April 2026.
This is where the charger and the CSMS meet. If a model does not report its status reliably, you cannot publish a reliable status. Ask suppliers how each state change reaches your backend, and test it on a pilot site before you buy at scale.
Interoperability: the version number is not the evidence
A charger that advertises OCPP 1.6 or 2.0.1 tells you the version, not which parts of the standard it implements or how. This is true of any manufacturer. The Open Charge Alliance runs certification programmes: for 1.6, the Core part is mandatory for both charger and CSMS, and the 2.0.1 programme offers Core, Advanced Security, Smart Charging and ISO 15118 Support. Ask for the certification evidence for each part you rely on, and test the rest yourself: remote start and stop, charging profiles, firmware updates, meter values.
Cybersecurity obligations to plan for
Two EU texts matter for operators who buy connected equipment.
For procurement, ask the manufacturer how it handles vulnerability reports and security updates, and for how long it commits to provide them.
This week
Pick the charger models that are most numerous in your estate or your pipeline. For each one, fill a one-page file: OCPP version and certification evidence, ISO 15118 parts and the installation date they apply to, payment device for points of 50 kW or more, status reporting tested, vulnerability and update policy. Do the same for every new supplier, whatever its origin. GFO Omni is a CSMS that supervises charge points over OCPP 1.6, 2.0.1 and 2.1.